So, you can expect a system-wide dark mode implementation and some improvements in look/feel. But, yes, you can customize the experience to a good extent.Īlso, note that GNOME 42 was not available as a stable release at the time of writing this. Instead, you will have to rely on GNOME Tweaks or extensions to make some changes. Not just the ability to customize, but you get a lot of control out-of-the-box for changing the theme, color, workspace effects, window management, and more without the need for any particular application/extension.įor some, the availability of options may not make a difference if you want to stick to the stock experience, no matter what.Īs for GNOME, you do not get a lot of out-of-the-box controls. KDE is the superior choice if you want to tinker and take control of the user experience.ĭon’t take my word for it you can follow our KDE customization guide to know the available options. It is just a personal observation, considering the development updates by KDE when compared to GNOME applications. I do not find myself using many apps by GNOME.Īnd, it is worth noting that the KDE applications that come with the desktop environment get faster improvements when compared to GNOME’s default applications. While it could be a sufficient list for most users, it falls short on the catalog compared to KDE. GNOME also features numerous applications by default. Many of them stand out among the available applications like Krita, Kdenlive, Kate Editor, and more. In addition to that, the entire KDE community is super busy adding new applications and tools to the arsenal. You will probably be overwhelmed with the applications available for KDE by KDE. ![]() With KDE, you get access to countless utilities. So, in terms of UI, KDE vs GNOME does not have a clear winner but depends on your requirements for functionality or a modern look. For instance, the widgets in the system tray offer way more options than you get with the applets on GNOME. Note that the UI may not be as functional and rich as KDE. To some, it might look cleaner without a taskbar, but it is up to your preferences. There’s no start/app/menu button here you have to click on the Activity Overview to access your workspaces (or virtual desktops) and access the app menu from the same place. However, adjusting the workflow could take a while if you are already comfortable with the traditional Windows-like layout. There’s a take on preferences, but GNOME looks more attractive, in my opinion. The icons/theme/wallpapers may look better regarding modern standards. GNOME should suit you well if you want a different and modern user interface design. GNOME, on the other hand, provides a unique desktop experience. In fact, Windows has taken inspiration from KDE for some of its UI improvements, like the ability to adjust the volume by scrolling the volume icon in the taskbar.Īnd, KDE is known for its consistent look and feel, even with numerous improvements over the years. The Plasma desktop aims to provide a traditional desktop layout comfortable for most Windows users.ĭon’t let that fool you, though-it is simple to look at but focused on more functionalities. ![]() The user interface generally involves the type of layout, icons, theme, widgets, and other components of a GUI. The User Interface: Functionality vs Look However, for simplicity, we tend to use “KDE” instead of “Plasma”. ![]() Here, we compare the Plasma desktop with GNOME. KDE is the entire community of people working on various projects under its umbrella.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |